<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Steroid Report - Latest Comments in Infinite Number of Undetectable Designer Steroids with Combinatorial Chemistry</title><link>http://steroidreport.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:30:11 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Infinite Number of Undetectable Designer Steroids with Combinatorial Chemistry</title><link>http://www.steroidreport.com/2008/08/22/combinatorial-chemistry-undetectable-designer-steroids/#comment-1899792</link><description>google on "designer steroid detection" and follow the first link:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1402217" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender....&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Their method extracts anything that binds specifically to androgen receptors and then applies conventional GC/MS analysis.   Any peak that does not match known endogenous compounds (e.g. testosterone) is, by definition, a non-natural androgen-receptor-binding compound.   You don't need to know its exact chemical structure to conclude that it shouldn't be there!  Of course the way you defeat this test is to dope with a naturally occurring compound.  But it should detect "designer" steroids of all kinds, both known and unknown, as well as SARMS.  No?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:30:11 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>